Imagine, you’re 22 years old and you face being accused of a murder you say you didn’t do. You have a “fair” trial, and you’re sentenced to life in prison. Despite your steadfast proclaiming of your innocence, it takes 27 years for you to be proven Innocent-not just released, but innocent. You’re now 50 years old with so much of your life taken away from you, how do you get your life back, and how can the “system” explain its mistake? This is what William Dillon is experiencing now.
August 1981, a man is beaten to death on Florida’s east coast. A driver who picked up a hitchhiker (who was the apparent murderer) who was wearing a bloody t-shirt from the woods near where the body was found. The bloody t-shirt was left in the truck after the hitchhiker was dropped off at a tavern. William was in the area and became a suspect. The pick-up driver was unable to pick-out Dillon from a lineup. His attorney’s where never notified of this despite the clear discovery requirement to do so.
A jailhouse snitch testified that William admitted to the murder despite the confession did not fit with some of the facts, and other prisoners where present who didn’t hear this confession. Shortly after the trial, rape charges against the snitch where dropped.
William’s ex-firlfriend testified against him, and less than two weeks after the trial, she recanted her testimony saying she was threatened with 25 years in prison if she didn’t testify against him. She also slept with the lead officer in the case during the investigation. A dog handler who has been responsible for at least 3 wrongful convictions because of his improper tracking techniques, testified that his dog alerted to a piece of paper that police had William touch.
Yet another innocent person in which either non-disclosed or improper evidence was used to obtain a conviction. Imagine all the things that you have done since you were 22, and William Dillon wasn’t able to experience just because he was at the wrong place at the wrong time.
Will our court system ever address the people who either knowing lie, present false testimony, unduly threaten people with repercussions for not saying what a prosecutor wants to hear, or go after those people who prepare “junk” theories to garner a name for themselves as an expert? At this time probably not.
Just ask William his thoughts about restitution for his life being taken away. He had possessed a Quaalude pill so he is not eligible for compensationunder the new Florida Law that allows for compensation for those who were wrongly convicted. He is now at the mercy of the legislatur to approve a special claims bill for his restitution. Imagine, we in Florida have so many wrongly convicted individuals that we have a law that is supposed to make compensation for these victim’s easier to receive.